Operational Intelligence Audit™Deliverable 06 of 07 · Illustrative deliverable

Flight Plan™ · 12-month transformation blueprint

Illustrative 12-month roadmap

This scenario sequences six example opportunities across three phases, with decision points to review evidence before continuing.

Client: Hartwell M&E Group
Scenario target: £708k to £970k
Horizon: 12 months · 3 phases
Turnover: £45m · 180 staff
Prepared by: BuiltAI Intelligence Ltd
Status: Phased and gated

Illustrative worked example: fictional project and parties; figures, names and dates are fictional scenario details.

£708kto £970k illustrative annual target

3Phases, a gate between each

6Workflows planned by month 12

52%Of the £1.87m bleed, at the upper end

BuiltAI Intelligence Ltd · built-ai.ioBAI-HME-AUD-006 · May 2026

01Shape

Three phases, a gate between each

This scenario groups six proposed workflows across three four-month phases. At each decision point, a client could review the evidence and choose whether to continue, adjust or hold.

The gate matters

This example leaves pace, scope and spend for a client to decide at each gate. A live decision would depend on evidence reviewed against agreed measures.

02By phase

Example phasing and target ranges

Phase	Months	Example workflows	Illustrative annual target
Phase 1 Prove and Recover	1 to 4	Bidroom in a Box™, Commercial Control Kit™	£350k to £477k
Phase 2 Visibility and Control	5 to 8	Margin Cockpit™ (margin, WIP), RAMS Factory	£227k to £312k
Phase 3 Extend and Integrate	9 to 12	Margin Cockpit™ (invoice), The Dispatch Desk™	£131k to £181k
Full 12-month programme		6 workflows	£708k to £970k

The displayed phase targets build to the full scenario range; the underlying assumptions are not supplied.

03Cumulative

Illustrative target range

The displayed phase targets build to £708k to £970k a year in this scenario. The assumptions behind them are not supplied, so treat the figures as planning illustrations rather than a forecast.

Phase 1 · cumulative£350k to £477k

Phases 1 to 2 · cumulative£577k to £789k

Phases 1 to 3 · full£708k to £970k

04Dependencies

Example assumptions to confirm

This scenario depends on assumptions a live engagement would need to confirm:

Stakeholder timeConfirm the lead time and commitment needed across the proposed phases

Data qualityCheck the data needed for the example workflows and targets

Tender pipelineConfirm tender-volume assumptions before applying the example comparison

System accessAgree access needed for any proposed service-desk workflow

Change managementPlan adoption support appropriate to the live engagement

Governance disciplineAgree how proposed governance controls would operate

Reference BAI-HME-AUD-006Horizon 12 months, 3 phasesScenario target £708k to £970k

05Gates

Example decision gates

This example framework compares agreed measures and adoption with the targets, then leaves the client to decide whether to continue, adjust or hold.

Gate	Timing	Example decision check	Illustrative target to date
Gate 1	End of month 4	Compare agreed Phase 1 measures and adoption with the example targets	£350k to £477k
Gate 2	End of month 8	Review agreed data-quality and workflow measures for the example Phase 2 scope	£577k to £789k
Gate 3	End of month 12	Review the full example target and decide whether to continue, adjust or hold	£708k to £970k

ContinueIf agreed measures and adoption support continuation, consider the next example phase.

AdjustIf measures or readiness differ from the example assumptions, consider re-scoping or re-sequencing.

HoldIf a blocker remains, a client could pause and review before any further commitment.

A client decision

This example leaves pace, scope and spend for the client to decide at each gate. A live decision would depend on evidence reviewed against measures agreed for that engagement.