OIA · Green Light - Phase 1 implementation proposal · Worked example Hartwell M&E Group · £45m turnover · 180 staff · Maturity 2.4 / 5 · 4-week diagnostic · Bleed Rate £1.87m (4.2% of turnover)
This is Phase 1 Proposal · OIA Green Light™ · Green Light™ (Pre-Con pre-mob QA gate - different doc, same name)
ILLUSTRATIVE · Operational Intelligence Audit™ · Deliverable 07 of 07

Green LightPHASE 1 IMPLEMENTATION PROPOSAL

Scope, timeline, deliverables, KPI targets and commercial model for the first phase of AI workflow implementation.

Prepared for
Hartwell M&E Group
Prepared by
Built AI Ltd
Date
May 2026
Green Light™ — Phase 1 Implementation Proposal
← Audit PackDeliverable 07 of 07BAI-HME-AUD-007
Section 01

Proposal Summary

A fixed-scope, 16-week implementation of the two highest-priority AI workflows identified during the Operational Intelligence Audit.

Scope

Commercial Control Kit™Bidroom in a Box™
Two workflow packs deployed across the commercial and estimating teams. Structured change event capture, variation narrative generation, tender scope extraction, assumptions automation and bid quality assurance.
Duration16 weeks
Start dateSubject to agreement (est. July 2026)
Delivery modelFixed scope, phased delivery
Target recovery£350k–£477k / yr
Admin hours released~1,200 hrs / yr
Decision gateEnd of Week 16
Obligation beyond Phase 1None
Audit fee credit. Where Phase 1 implementation is commissioned within 30 days of audit completion, a portion of the audit fee will be credited against the Phase 1 implementation programme. This creates a clear commercial pathway from diagnostic to delivery.
Section 02

What’s Included

Everything delivered during Phase 1, from governance setup through workflow deployment to performance review.

#DeliverableDescriptionTiming
01Governance onboardingData classification training, approval gate setup, audit trail templates, escalation procedures. 30-minute session per workflow user. Governance framework from Deliverable 05 operationalised.Week 1–2
02Assumptions library buildStructured library of standard assumptions by contract type, client type and work category. Built from Hartwell’s existing tender archive and commercial knowledge. Maintained and expanded throughout Phase 1.Week 1–3
03Bidroom in a Box™ deploymentTender intelligence workflow deployed and operational. Scope extraction, assumptions generation, clarification identification, risk register production and compliance pre-fill. Applied to all new tenders from Week 4.Week 2–4
04Commercial Control Kit™ deploymentChange event capture, contractual notice drafting, evidence indexing, variation narrative generation and pipeline tracking. Deployed on 3–5 priority contracts initially, extending to 8–10 contracts by Week 12.Week 4–8
05Weekly workflow supportBuilt AI provides ongoing workflow support throughout Phase 1. Includes workflow refinement, assumptions library updates, user guidance and issue resolution. Estimated 4–6 hours per week.Ongoing
06Monthly performance reportMonthly report tracking KPIs, workflow usage, time savings, commercial recovery, user feedback and any incidents. Provides the data for the Phase 1 review.Monthly
07Quarterly governance reviewFirst quarterly review of the governance framework. Assess controls, review incident log, evaluate proportionality and adjust where needed.Week 12
08Phase 1 results reportComprehensive review of Phase 1 outcomes against KPI targets. Includes ROI analysis, user adoption metrics, workflow maturity assessment and Phase 2 recommendation with updated scope and pricing.Week 15–16
Section 03

Scope Boundaries

Clear definition of what is and is not included in Phase 1 to avoid scope ambiguity.

Included in Phase 1

Commercial Control Kit™ and Bidroom in a Box™ workflows
Governance framework onboarding and operationalisation
Assumptions library build and maintenance
Weekly workflow support (4–6 hrs / week)
Monthly performance reporting
Quarterly governance review
Phase 1 results report and Phase 2 recommendation
Up to 15 users across estimating and commercial teams

Not included in Phase 1

RAMS, margin reporting, invoice or service desk workflows (Phase 2–3)
System integration (Sage 200, CAFM, CRM)
Custom software development or bespoke platform build
Hardware, infrastructure or IT changes
Legal advice on data protection or procurement compliance
Training beyond governance onboarding (additional training available)
On-site presence (delivery is remote with optional site visits)
Ongoing managed operations beyond Phase 1 (separate proposal)
Section 04

KPI Targets

Measurable targets for Phase 1, providing clear criteria for evaluating success at Decision Gate 1.

KPICurrent baselinePhase 1 targetMeasurementConfidence
Tender processing time94 hrs / tender
(38 hrs admin)
56–66 hrs / tender
(30–40% admin reduction)
Hours logged per tenderHigh
Tenders processed / quarter16–1720–22
(capacity increase)
Bid log countHigh
Scope items extracted per tender51 avg65–70
(+30% coverage)
Extraction logHigh
Change events formally captured41% of events
(58 of 142)
70–80%
(within notice window)
Variation logMedium
Average notice-to-submission time18 working days8–12 working daysVariation log datesHigh
Evidence assembly time per variation4.5 hours1.5–2.0 hoursTime trackingHigh
Variation pipeline visibilityMonthly spreadsheet
(retrospective)
Real-time pipeline
(live tracker)
Pipeline dashboardHigh
Commercial recovery (annualised)£620k leakage
(41% capture rate)
£248k–£341k recovered
(40–55% of leakage)
Sage 200 / variation logMedium
Measurement approach. KPI baselines are established during Week 1–2 using data from the audit. Monthly performance reports track progress against each target. The Phase 1 results report (Week 15–16) provides the definitive assessment against all KPI targets, feeding directly into the Decision Gate 1 review.
Section 05

Commercial Model

Phase 1 pricing, payment structure and commercial terms.

Phase 1 investment

Implementation fee£[REDACTED]
Fixed scope · 16 weeks · Two workflow packs
Payment structureThree staged payments aligned to delivery milestones:
Payment 1: On commencement (governance + mobilisation)
Payment 2: On workflow deployment (both packs operational)
Payment 3: On Phase 1 completion (results report delivered)
Audit fee creditWhere commissioned within 30 days of audit completion, £[REDACTED] of the audit fee is credited against Payment 1.
What’s includedAll 8 deliverables listed in Section 02. Governance onboarding, workflow deployment, assumptions library, weekly support, monthly reporting, quarterly governance review and Phase 1 results report.
Obligation beyond Phase 1None. Phase 1 is a standalone engagement. There is no obligation to proceed to Phase 2. The decision is made at Decision Gate 1 based on results.
£350k–£477k
Target annual recovery
vs Phase 1 investment

The target recovery in the first year alone is a significant multiple of the Phase 1 investment.

Even at the conservative end of the recovery range, the workflows are expected to return their cost within the first quarter of operation. The commercial case strengthens further when combined with the capacity benefit: 11 declined tenders representing £836k in potential pipeline revenue.

Section 06

Next Steps

How to proceed from audit findings to Phase 1 implementation.

StepActionDetailTimeline
1Leadership reviewReview all seven audit deliverables with the leadership team. Confirm agreement with findings, priority ranking and Phase 1 scope.Within 1 week
2Scope confirmation call30-minute call with Built AI to confirm Phase 1 scope, timeline, start date and any adjustments. Address any questions from the leadership review.Within 2 weeks
3Proposal acceptanceWritten acceptance of the Phase 1 proposal. Built AI issues the engagement letter and invoice for Payment 1.Within 30 days
4MobilisationGovernance onboarding scheduled. First tender pack identified. Priority contracts selected for commercial capture deployment. Assumptions library build begins.Week 1

Ready to proceed?

Contact Built AI to confirm Phase 1 scope and start date.
Email
hello@built-ai.io
Web
built-ai.io/contact
Reference
BAI-HME-AUD-007
End of pack
Back to the Operational Intelligence Audit