Compare workflow packs
Seven packs, side by side.
Use this if you already know roughly where control is leaking and want to compare two or three candidate packs head-to-head. Not sure where to start? Use the pack finder.
Outcome metrics are illustrative or typical and disclosure-tagged per BuiltAI's publishing rules — they are not guarantees of recovery, savings or commercial outcomes.
| Attribute | 01Commercial Control Kit | 02Bidroom in a Box | 03RAMS Factory | 04Service Desk AI Pack | 05Operational Margin Cockpit | 06Contract Obligations Register | 07AI Governance Policy Pack |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best for | Protect margin before it leaks | Turn tenders into controlled workflows | Standardise safety documentation | Improve triage and SLA evidence | Make performance board-ready | Make contract obligations operational | Adopt AI safely |
| What it solves | Teams often know the issue exists, but lack a repeatable workflow, ownership model and reporting structure to control it. | Teams often know the issue exists, but lack a repeatable workflow, ownership model and reporting structure to control it. | Teams often know the issue exists, but lack a repeatable workflow, ownership model and reporting structure to control it. | Teams often know the issue exists, but lack a repeatable workflow, ownership model and reporting structure to control it. | Teams often know the issue exists, but lack a repeatable workflow, ownership model and reporting structure to control it. | Teams often know the issue exists, but lack a repeatable workflow, ownership model and reporting structure to control it. | Teams often know the issue exists, but lack a repeatable workflow, ownership model and reporting structure to control it. |
| What gets installedCount of discrete artefacts | 7items shipped
| 6items shipped
| 7items shipped
| 6items shipped
| 7items shipped
| 5items shipped
| 6items shipped
|
| Primary outcomeFirst-90-day target — disclosure-tagged | 12–18%Variation recovery improvement in first 90 daysIllustrative | +5ptsIndicative win-rate uplift after installIllustrative | 12Active RAMS per site, managed in one workflowTypical | 92Service contracts cross-referenced in first reviewTypical | 1Unified reporting rhythm replacing multiple spreadsheetsTypical | 100%Of material clauses with named owners + deadlinesTarget outcome | 100%Of AI invocations classified + loggedTarget outcome |
| Time to deploy | 4 weeks | 3 weeks | 4 weeks | 3 weeks | 4 weeks | 3 weeks | On audit completion |
| Governance gate | Evidence index, assumptions register, QA gates, client approval and professional boundary wording where required. | Evidence index, assumptions register, QA gates, client approval and professional boundary wording where required. | Evidence index, assumptions register, QA gates, client approval and professional boundary wording where required. | Evidence index, assumptions register, QA gates, client approval and professional boundary wording where required. | Evidence index, assumptions register, QA gates, client approval and professional boundary wording where required. | Evidence index, assumptions register, QA gates, client approval and professional boundary wording where required. | Evidence index, assumptions register, QA gates, client approval and professional boundary wording where required. |
| Success criteria | Clear owners, consistent templates, visible status, QA checks and a repeatable reporting rhythm. | Clear owners, consistent templates, visible status, QA checks and a repeatable reporting rhythm. | Clear owners, consistent templates, visible status, QA checks and a repeatable reporting rhythm. | Clear owners, consistent templates, visible status, QA checks and a repeatable reporting rhythm. | Clear owners, consistent templates, visible status, QA checks and a repeatable reporting rhythm. | Clear owners, consistent templates, visible status, QA checks and a repeatable reporting rhythm. | Clear owners, consistent templates, visible status, QA checks and a repeatable reporting rhythm. |
| Action | Book Commercial Leakage Audit | Request Tender Efficiency Audit | Request RAMS Consistency Audit | Request Service Desk Readiness Review | Request Dashboard Demo | Request Obligations Review | Request Governance Review |
01Commercial Control Kit - Best for
- Protect margin before it leaks
- What it solves
- Teams often know the issue exists, but lack a repeatable workflow, ownership model and reporting structure to control it.
- What gets installed
- 7items shipped
- Instruction log
- Notice tracker
- Variation register
- + 4 more
- Primary outcome
- 12–18%Variation recovery improvement in first 90 daysIllustrative
- Time to deploy
- 4 weeks
- Governance gate
- Evidence index, assumptions register, QA gates, client approval and professional boundary wording where required.
- Success criteria
- Clear owners, consistent templates, visible status, QA checks and a repeatable reporting rhythm.
02Bidroom in a Box - Best for
- Turn tenders into controlled workflows
- What it solves
- Teams often know the issue exists, but lack a repeatable workflow, ownership model and reporting structure to control it.
- What gets installed
- 6items shipped
- Tender intake form
- Requirement traceability matrix
- Scope skeleton templates
- + 3 more
- Primary outcome
- +5ptsIndicative win-rate uplift after installIllustrative
- Time to deploy
- 3 weeks
- Governance gate
- Evidence index, assumptions register, QA gates, client approval and professional boundary wording where required.
- Success criteria
- Clear owners, consistent templates, visible status, QA checks and a repeatable reporting rhythm.
03RAMS Factory - Best for
- Standardise safety documentation
- What it solves
- Teams often know the issue exists, but lack a repeatable workflow, ownership model and reporting structure to control it.
- What gets installed
- 7items shipped
- RAMS intake form
- Task & hazard selector
- Control measures library
- + 4 more
- Primary outcome
- 12Active RAMS per site, managed in one workflowTypical
- Time to deploy
- 4 weeks
- Governance gate
- Evidence index, assumptions register, QA gates, client approval and professional boundary wording where required.
- Success criteria
- Clear owners, consistent templates, visible status, QA checks and a repeatable reporting rhythm.
04Service Desk AI Pack - Best for
- Improve triage and SLA evidence
- What it solves
- Teams often know the issue exists, but lack a repeatable workflow, ownership model and reporting structure to control it.
- What gets installed
- 6items shipped
- Triage scripts
- SLA priority mapping
- Escalation triggers
- + 3 more
- Primary outcome
- 92Service contracts cross-referenced in first reviewTypical
- Time to deploy
- 3 weeks
- Governance gate
- Evidence index, assumptions register, QA gates, client approval and professional boundary wording where required.
- Success criteria
- Clear owners, consistent templates, visible status, QA checks and a repeatable reporting rhythm.
05Operational Margin Cockpit - Best for
- Make performance board-ready
- What it solves
- Teams often know the issue exists, but lack a repeatable workflow, ownership model and reporting structure to control it.
- What gets installed
- 7items shipped
- KPI dashboard
- Pack performance reporting
- Board report template
- + 4 more
- Primary outcome
- 1Unified reporting rhythm replacing multiple spreadsheetsTypical
- Time to deploy
- 4 weeks
- Governance gate
- Evidence index, assumptions register, QA gates, client approval and professional boundary wording where required.
- Success criteria
- Clear owners, consistent templates, visible status, QA checks and a repeatable reporting rhythm.
- Action
- Request Dashboard Demo
06Contract Obligations Register - Best for
- Make contract obligations operational
- What it solves
- Teams often know the issue exists, but lack a repeatable workflow, ownership model and reporting structure to control it.
- What gets installed
- 5items shipped
- Clause extraction workflow
- Obligations register
- Notice deadlines tracker
- + 2 more
- Primary outcome
- 100%Of material clauses with named owners + deadlinesTarget outcome
- Time to deploy
- 3 weeks
- Governance gate
- Evidence index, assumptions register, QA gates, client approval and professional boundary wording where required.
- Success criteria
- Clear owners, consistent templates, visible status, QA checks and a repeatable reporting rhythm.
07AI Governance Policy Pack - Best for
- Adopt AI safely
- What it solves
- Teams often know the issue exists, but lack a repeatable workflow, ownership model and reporting structure to control it.
- What gets installed
- 6items shipped
- Acceptable use policy (AUP)
- R/A/G data classification rules
- Human approval gates
- + 3 more
- Primary outcome
- 100%Of AI invocations classified + loggedTarget outcome
- Time to deploy
- On audit completion
- Governance gate
- Evidence index, assumptions register, QA gates, client approval and professional boundary wording where required.
- Success criteria
- Clear owners, consistent templates, visible status, QA checks and a repeatable reporting rhythm.