Cockpit · Forecast vs Actual (FVA) · Worked example Meridian M&E Ltd · 8 contracts · April 2026 (Month 7) · Margin 21.4% (target 22%) · £14.2m
This is Portfolio FvA · forecast vs actual margin · FAP (CCK final account position)
← Margin Cockpit
● BUILT AI — MARGIN COCKPIT™ — EXAMPLE OUTPUT — All client, site and project details are fictional and for illustration purposes only.
BuiltAI
Confidential
Ref: BAI-FVA-2026-04
Generated: 30 April 2026
Operational Margin Cockpit™ · Forecast vs Actual

Forecast vs Actual

Budget versus outturn analysis for each contract — showing planned cost, actual cost, revenue variance, margin variance and forecast-at-completion confidence. Period ending 30 April 2026.

Budget margin
22.0%
portfolio target
Actual margin
21.4%
−0.6pp vs budget
Cost variance
+£184k
over budget
Revenue variance
+£118k
above forecast
Forecast confidence
74%
weighted avg
01
Summary

At the portfolio level, actual margin is running at 21.4% against a budget of 22.0% — a variance of −0.6 percentage points. This gap is narrower than last month (−1.2pp in March) thanks to the Whitmore Tower variation approval, but remains driven by two underperforming contracts.

Costs are running £184k over budget in aggregate. However, revenue is also £118k above forecast due to approved variations and favourable subcontract outturn, partially offsetting the cost overrun. The net margin shortfall is £66k — the gap between £118k of additional revenue recovery and £184k of cost overrun.

Forecast confidence varies significantly across the portfolio: four contracts are rated High (>80%), three are Medium (60–80%) and one — Riverside FM — is rated Low (48%) due to the combination of disputed deductions, rejected applications and uncertain volume trajectory.

02
Contract Forecast vs Actual 8 contracts
Contract Revenue (£'000) Cost (£'000) Margin Confidence
Budget Actual Var Budget Actual Var Budget % Actual % Var pp
Whitmore TowerCBRE · Refurb 2,340 2,410 +70 1,825 1,802 −23 22.0% 25.2% +3.2 92%
Docklands Phase 2Lendlease · Construction 3,760 3,800 +40 2,932 2,924 −8 22.0% 23.1% +1.1 88%
Alderley ParkAstraZeneca · Lab Fit 1,180 1,200 +20 920 902 −18 22.0% 24.8% +2.8 86%
Mersey GatewayPeel Group · Services 1,580 1,600 +20 1,232 1,242 +10 22.0% 22.4% +0.4 82%
Cathedral QuarterISG · Fitout 2,100 2,100 1,638 1,694 +56 22.0% 19.4% −2.6 68%
Pennine Pkg CKier · Works Pkg 1,380 1,400 +20 1,076 1,138 +62 22.0% 18.7% −3.3 66%
Trafford RetailMace · Refit 700 710 +10 546 574 +28 22.0% 19.2% −2.8 62%
Riverside FMMitie · FM Yr 2 1,020 980 −40 796 834 +38 22.0% 14.8% −7.2 48%
Portfolio 14,060 14,200 +140 10,965 11,110 +145 22.0% 21.4% −0.6 74%
03
Variance Analysis
Revenue variance — +£140k above forecast
Whitmore Tower — asbestos variation approved
+£70k
Docklands Ph 2 — additional measured works
+£40k
Other contracts — minor variation approvals
+£70k
Riverside FM — volume below contract cap
−£40k
Revenue upside is primarily variation-driven. Riverside FM is the only contract tracking below its revenue forecast — reactive call volumes are 12% below the contracted cap, reducing the revenue base.
Cost variance — +£145k over budget
Pennine Pkg C — labour + material overrun
+£62k
Cathedral Quarter — prelim overrun (programme slip)
+£56k
Riverside FM — SLA deductions + additional resource
+£38k
Trafford Retail — night shift + welfare ext.
+£28k
3 contracts — subcontract savings offset
−£39k
Cost overruns are concentrated in four contracts. Pennine and Cathedral are programme-related (addressable through recovery claims). Riverside and Trafford include one-off costs not expected to recur.
04
Forecast Confidence Assessment
High confidence · >80%
4 contracts — Whitmore Tower (92%), Docklands (88%), Alderley Park (86%), Mersey Gateway (82%). These contracts have stable cost profiles, approved variations and predictable remaining programmes. Forecast-at-completion is expected to be within ±2% of current position.
£9.0m
63% of portfolio value
Medium confidence · 60–80%
3 contracts — Cathedral Quarter (68%), Pennine Pkg C (66%), Trafford Retail (62%). These have active cost pressures (prelim overrun, labour reallocation) with partial mitigation through variation claims. Outturn could swing ±4% depending on claim outcomes and programme recovery.
£4.2m
30% of portfolio value
Low confidence · <60%
1 contract — Riverside FM (48%). Multiple compounding uncertainties: disputed deductions (£28k), rejected applications (£212k WIP + CNI), below-cap reactive volumes, and an unresolved counter-claim. Outturn could swing ±8pp depending on dispute resolution and volume trajectory.
£1.0m
7% of portfolio value
05
Forecast at Completion — Scenarios

Three scenarios for portfolio outturn based on different assumptions about claim recovery, cost control and dispute resolution.

Downside
19.8%
Claims lost, costs continue
Margin £ = £1,126k
Base case
21.6%
Current trajectory + pipeline
Margin £ = £1,298k
Upside
22.4%
Claims recovered, costs controlled
Margin £ = £1,382k
Key swing factors: Mersey Gateway re-measure claim (£31k, deadline 15 May), Riverside FM dispute resolution (£28k, 6–8 weeks), Cathedral Quarter time claim (£8k, under review), and whether Pennine Pkg C variation (£18k) is approved. In the base case, 70% of submitted pipeline converts at the rolling average recovery rate of 82%.
Up next
MAL · Monthly Action Log
← Or back to the Margin Cockpit page