How this workflow could help
Service desk SLA recovery
Multi-site IFM operator with inconsistent triage and weak ticket QA against client SLA scorecards.
01 / At a glance
The opportunity this scenario explores.
See the work this workflow could organise and the decisions your team would retain.
Pre-breach
watchlist surfaces tickets in the morning
Weekly
QA scoring rhythm - not month-end review
Per ticket
immutable QA + triage decision row
Current pattern
- Tickets escalate after they breach, not before
- Triage classification is operator-by-operator, no shared rules
- QA samples are spreadsheet exports nobody trusts
- SLA scorecards land at month-end with no time to react
With a structured workflow
- Pre-breach watchlist surfaces tickets in the morning rhythm
- Triage rules are templated and applied consistently
- QA scoring writes an immutable row, reviewed weekly
- SLA cohort view tracks recovery within the period it lands
02 / Inside the workflow
How the work could change.
Situation
A multi-site IFM operator was being scored down at monthly client reviews because P1/P2 triage decisions varied by helpdesk operator. Ticket-level QA was anecdotal, and SLA breaches were investigated reactively rather than tracked weekly.
Each missed SLA was investigated in isolation after the client raised it, so the same triage gaps recurred month after month - and the scorecard penalty compounded before anyone connected the pattern.
Discipline installed
Triage workflow with classification rules and named QA gates per ticket priority. SLA cohort views slice the active backlog by SLA proximity rather than open age.
Weekly cadence reviewing breach risk before it lands; knowledge-capture register turning recurring failure modes into reusable resolution patterns.
What could change
A shared triage record could help operators surface breach-risk tickets before the SLA window closes.
Monthly client reviews would have the triage decision and named QA reviewer alongside each SLA outcome.
Governance gate reinforced
Reinforces the audit-trail non-negotiable: every ticket decision writes an audit-logged QA row. Operators and supervisors review the same record at the monthly client meeting.
In practice
What could be prepared
The working setup.
Triage workflow, SLA cohort views, ticket QA checklist, knowledge-capture register and weekly cadence.
Potential change
Could support sharper triage decisions, clearer SLA scorecards and a more complete monthly review record.
Read the Dispatch Desk pack03 / Your next step
What could clearer workflows unlock for your business?
Bring us the work you want to improve. We can explore where BuiltAI could help, what information it needs and where your people stay in control.
Discuss Your Starting Point